Crime of the Century: My Own Little Conspiracy Theory

by branzen November 5, 2020

How deep does the fraud in this election go? Can it be easily exposed? I think it can.

Politicians push everyone to get absentee/mail-in ballots. You know, because of the CovAIDS.

There are records kept for the number of mail-in ballots requested and the number of mail-in ballots returned, as well as the number of mail-in ballots counted.

Vote early they said. Okay.

The equation: Just days before the election, take the number of requested mail-in ballots and the number of returned mail-in ballots and flood the county with the difference (all for… Oh let’s just say Joe Biden).

Is this why batches of 10s of thousands of ballots (sometimes 100k+) have been discovered, and amazingly they are all for Biden. Convenient.

Problem: the possibility that some of the requested mail-in ballots from actual voters will still be returned, and if you’re really desperate to win a State then you might just throw caution to the wind and flood the county with more than the equation allows.

Exposing the Fraud:

I’d be willing to bet that if you acquire the records for each county: mail-in ballots requested; mail-in ballots returned; and, mail-in ballots counted. You will start to see patterns regarding mail-in ballots like…

Ballots Requested: 108,539
Ballots Returned: 89,681
Ballots Counted: 142,584

That’s a discrepancy of 52,903 ballots, most of which are probably fraudulent, and, wow, wouldn’t you know it, all for Biden. Coincidence.

Supposedly, the numbers above, which were reported by a TV News show in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania have been “debunked”. The debunker’s claim is that the “total number” of ballots counted was reported as the “Mail-In Ballots” counted. However, on the Lancaster County election results webpage the “Total Ballots” counted is 273,527. That doesn’t add up.

Interesting statistic I picked up from the Pennsylvania Department of State website regarding registered voters in Lancaster County:

Registered Democrats: 115,277
Registered Republicans: 181,296

That gives us a total of 296,573 registered voters in Lancaster County. That means the voter turnout was 92%. WOW! The typical voter turnout is approximately 70% of registered voters. Must be some kind of a record, I’m sure.

Hmmm… What would happen if I subtract those 52,903 ghost voters (in just one county) from the 273,527 total votes counted? Well, I would get 220,624 actual voters, which would translate to a 74% voter turnout. Interesting.

Let’s get these reports from every county in the US. The Shenanigans will emerge.

Or, maybe it’s all in my head (and you don’t even want to go there, thinking happens… and stuff)

11 comments

Jim November 5, 2020 at 4:35 am

You are absolutely right. Great research and lets hope and pray our presidents lawyers have your thought process. I’m with you to the bone. Patriot, you are ? percent.

branzen November 5, 2020 at 4:40 am

Thank you. I truly appreciate the feedback and blessing.

Daniel Ellis November 5, 2020 at 4:54 am

If the recount is tampered with. The revolt is on. Justice is fair but she’s not intended to be this blind. She certainly isn’t deaf either. She hears the outcries of the people, and the American people will not be subverted, subjugated, or subdued by evil this overtly grotesque!

Lardogthemarine November 5, 2020 at 7:04 am

We conservatives were sounding the alarm for this very scenario. What gets me is it’s so blatant and they think we’re the idiots. ALL MAIL IN VITES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED COMPROMISED AND SHOULD BE WITHDRAWN. Thanks for the investigative work.

Zachary James November 5, 2020 at 7:49 am

Let’s hope time will tell. Fall 2020 is trying to live up to, or even surpass, the drama of the Spring/Summer.

John November 5, 2020 at 8:56 am

The whole thing was telegraphed and basically admitted to prior to the election. Unbelievably obvious and the same pattern the Soros funded color revolutions in places like Ukraine etc. I wish people weren’t so easily duped, but alas here we are. The media broadcasts its spells and they seem to work.

branzen November 6, 2020 at 3:03 pm

I agree, and I find a modicum of solace in knowing not as many are duped as I had previously estimated.

The Taxpayer November 6, 2020 at 2:21 pm

As always, both the research and thought process are clear and definitive . . . . . . well done, my friend!

A couple of observations, on my part . . . . .

As should be easily recognized and understood with all politics and government . . . . . money is the common denominator and so always runs the show, regardless of what we have all conditioned ourselves to believe as part of “our american dream”, especially collectively as a society and culture. Yes, we all have the “”right” to vote . . . . . but what does that really mean to a US IDIVIDUAL’s administrative appearance “within the US” . . . and what is the real (civil) importance for which each of “us” is actually and INDIVIDUALLY casting a “vote”?

The initial red flag was (most likely) when the “relevance” and so-called necessity of mail in ballots was “suggested” and recommended by some individual or group that presumably possesses some sort or form of (supposed) knowledge and authority to do so . . . . I could be mistaken, but they were probably wearing a mask. Like pretty much all other PUBLIC (mis)information, this civilly contrived election circumstance and socially spread “voter” condition is yet just another mere presumption, just like “the virus” . . . . . . which each of us either rebuts as misinformation and hearsay, or conclusively proves as real time evidence, in fact, with self-chosen voluntary action(s). The “majority” has already fallen for the most recently presumed health pandemic, so why or how is it that the “american people” wouldn’t continue to be blindly led, once again, by their own hand(s) and choice(s) . . . . ?

We all (should) know how things go in a democracy, especially in a pecuniary sense . . . . . the (money) majority rules, and this sometimes equates to little more than mob mentality, which present day Congress continues to demonstrate. Just because it’s commonly “believed” that it matters which political party is presiding as the CEO of the U.S. CORPORATION, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the same is actually so. I am inclined to question how much any one single president can substantially do in regard to the overall US CORPORATE (administrative) process in one (or even two) presidential terms . . . . and how much of a lasting effect any so-called change realistically has on any one of us . . . . . ?

This is not to say that one’s vote doesn’t matter . . . . . it’s the (fundamental) subject matter of the vote that is being questioned and evaluated.

One would have to question what would have occurred if every voter had ignored the bull shit, and shown up and voted “personally” . . . . we’ll never know for sure, although we can all be pretty damn certain that regardless of whether Biden or Trump serves as the chief executive for the next four years, all will continue to be as it is . . . . . and most likely just as it has been . . . . . because as of this very moment, most of “us” are still blindly and mindlessly continuing administratively just as we always have.

Conspiracy . . . . . . . possibly, but it seems to make more sense that it’s simply “business as usual” in the good ol’ USA . . . . . . just sayin.

branzen November 6, 2020 at 3:00 pm

You my own reservations regarding the Corporation echo yours. However, my assessment of the current CEO is that his policies have, generally, been good for the American people and the restoration of the Constitutional Republic. More so than any other CEO in my lifetime.

The good news, regardless who the next CEO is, it appears that the state of the Senate, House, and Courts is sufficient to somewhat maintain the gridlock of a healthy “Constitutional Republic” for a few more years.

The Taxpayer November 6, 2020 at 6:13 pm

I agree . . . . . Mr. Trump has and continues to serve as a corporate chief executive better than his predecessors, most notably in regard to the preservation of the (Constitutional) Republic, and the Senate, House, and Courts are (Republicly) well positioned also . . . . but then again, he is a business man not a politician. Remember though, that Franklin himself said that it was the people who would be responsible for keeping and maintaining the Republic . . . . . but that doesn’t mean that doing so necessarily lies within the Constitution, or the Senate House and Courts. It makes more sense that due to the Republic being outside and beyond the US, one’s means for keeping and maintaining the same would probably be found without the US, as well. If this is so, then any CEO and/or other elected so-called “leader” can’t participate within the Republic, nor can they legislate and mandate its affairs and administration. I wonder how many of us have (ever) considered this conditional circumstance . . . . . . . and also given thought to how, why, and where, each of “us” as a US INDIVIDUAL, may be affected in relation to the same . . . . . ?

Primarily and fundamentally, if one tries to follow the money from a broader global perspective . . . . . . it’s quite possible that there is something greater occurring which demands some of our (universal) attention, as humans . . . . . even though from a limited perspective (within the US in an election year) it may appear to be otherwise . . . . . and perhaps our self-responsibilty for the self-operation, as well as the self-preservation, of the Republic, may be (monetarily) invisible in plain sight . . . . . but we’re all too damn caught up and distracted by “current” events and social issues to engage and cooperate.

Again . . . . . simply observations on my part.

Elizabeth Renteria November 9, 2020 at 8:34 pm

Such a simple observation. Too obvious for “Libs” to see their own sloppy accounting.